AI Arena — model leaderboard

A live ranking of AI models on how well they handle real agentic work — task success, steerability, recovery from failures and tool reliability. Compare GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok and more, then run any of them through one API.

34 models1,044,956 sessionsUpdated 2026-07-13

Agent Arena overall ranking — lower is better.

1.Claude Fable 5 (High)
+13.94%
2.GPT 5.6 Sol (xHigh)
+10.94%
3.Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking)
+9.28%
4.GPT 5.5 (xHigh)
+8.26%
5.Claude Sonnet 5 (High)
+8%
6.Claude Opus 4.7 (Thinking)
+7.73%
7.Claude Opus 4.7
+7.63%
8.GPT 5.5 (High)
+7.16%
9.GLM 5.2 (Max)
+6.24%
10.GPT 5.5
+6.05%
#ModelLabOverallSuccessPraiseSteerabilityRecoveryHalluc.Sessions
1
Claude Fable 5 (High)
Anthropic+13.94%+17.27%30.65%12.07%8.39%1.33%16,059
2
GPT 5.6 Sol (xHigh)
OpenAI+10.94%+10.93%17.64%17.26%7.53%1.33%7,881
3
Claude Opus 4.8 (Thinking)
Anthropic+9.28%+7.82%17.96%10.15%9.91%0.56%33,392
4
GPT 5.5 (xHigh)
OpenAI+8.26%+6.88%12.61%6.7%13.79%1.33%36,289
5
Claude Sonnet 5 (High)
Anthropic+8%+10.33%13.9%4.92%9.62%1.21%23,640
6
Claude Opus 4.7 (Thinking)
Anthropic+7.73%+5.22%11.36%9.17%11.7%1.22%34,357
7
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic+7.63%+5.28%13.38%7.56%10.66%1.27%34,950
8
GPT 5.5 (High)
OpenAI+7.16%+6.42%7.61%8.72%11.75%1.33%61,455
9
GLM 5.2 (Max)
Zai+6.24%+8.72%12.59%4.1%4.45%1.33%31,993
10
GPT 5.5
OpenAI+6.05%+4.33%5.53%7.99%11.06%1.33%62,335
11Anthropic+5.88%+1.67%9.05%6.7%10.63%1.33%34,075
12
GPT 5.4 (High)
OpenAI+5.86%+6.15%4.4%7.88%9.55%1.33%61,743
13
Grok 4.5
xAI+4.99%+6.95%6.09%0.88%9.72%1.33%9,851
14
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic+3.90%+6.75%11.17%7.79%9.44%-15.63%31,463
15Anthropic+1.99%-1.95%-0.75%0.64%10.71%1.3%34,873
16
GLM 5.1
Zai+1.19%+0.78%0.53%-0.62%3.95%1.33%51,362
17
Qwen3.7 Plus
Alibaba-0.61%-1.10%-4.04%-2.73%4.65%0.19%10,048
18
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google-0.70%+0.63%-0.07%1.85%-7.21%1.29%61,459
19
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot-0.76%+4.51%1.38%-10.78%-0.23%1.33%7,468
20
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba-0.81%-2.25%-5.38%-4.16%6.84%0.91%9,944
21
DeepSeek V4 Pro
DeepSeek-1.11%-2.95%-4.79%-3.1%4.5%0.8%10,335
22
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)
Google-1.12%+1.66%-4.58%-0.8%-0.71%-1.17%45,991
23
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot-2.09%+2.36%-0.2%-9.16%-4.79%1.33%7,620
24
Mimo V2.5 Pro
Xiaomi-3.17%-6%-9.22%-4.81%3.55%0.63%10,379
25
Minimax M3
MiniMax-3.23%-7.51%-8.13%-7.92%6.27%1.14%9,913
26
DeepSeek V4 Flash
DeepSeek-4.64%-6.86%-12.9%-6.99%4.1%-0.53%10,051
27
Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium)
Google-7.04%-11.84%-8.07%-10.43%-5.9%1.04%7,041
28
Grok Build 0.1
xAI-8.21%-5.27%-13.65%-12.84%-9.83%0.53%52,802
29
Grok 4.3 (High)
xAI-8.31%-8.81%-15.63%-7.97%-10.06%0.92%41,665
30Google-8.54%-8.46%-12.83%-5.24%-16.46%0.28%62,100
31
Minimax M2.7
MiniMax-11.46%-16.97%-15.68%-17.75%-7.94%1.06%10,183
32
Gemma 4 31B
Google-13.58%-3.54%-6.03%-5.33%-30.16%-22.86%51,231
33
Nemotron 3 Ultra
Nvidia-13.68%-13.69%-11.1%-23.99%-19.12%-0.51%9,511
34
Grok 4.3
xAI-15.31%-10.12%-16.64%-8.96%-41.9%1.1%61,497

Data source: Agent Arena (arena.ai) · lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset · CC BY 4.0 · updated daily

How the ranking works

Each model is scored on real agentic sessions: whether it completes the task, how well it takes corrections (steerability), how reliably it recovers from failed commands, and how often it invents tools that don't exist (lower is better). Switch the lens above to sort by any of these.

AI model comparison (AI arena)

The ranking compares neural networks — GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok and others — on real agentic tasks: task success, steerability, recovery from errors and reliability of tool use. Any model in the table can be run through one AnyModel API.

Run the top models through one API

No subscriptions — pay per token, free to start. Switch between any model on the board by changing one id.

Get a free key →